PHYSICAL ACTIVITY DOMAINS IN WOMEN OF THE SECOND MATURE PERIOD: COMPARATIVE IPAQ ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2025.19.4.21Keywords:
International Physical Activity Questionnaire, domains, posture, postural deviations, women aged 36–45 years, health-oriented fitnessAbstract
Introduction. Data from international studies using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) demonstrate considerable variability in overall physical activity (PA) among women in the second period of adulthood. Most studies indicate a decline in total PA after the age of 40. A substantial proportion of women (typically 20–40 %) are classified as having a “low” level of PA according to IPAQ, not reaching the minimum 600 MET-min/week. This can be attributed to both biological factors (menopause) and social changes (shift in roles and responsibilities). Menopausal symptoms, such as fatigue, sleep disturbances, hot flashes, and joint pain, act as direct physical barriers to initiating PA, leading women to prefer low-intensity activities to reduce discomfort.Objective. To assess domain-specific physical activity of women aged 36–45 years in the spheres of “Work/Study” and “Transportation”. Methods. The study employed theoretical analysis and literature review, sociological methods, and statistical analysis.Results. Total weekly energy expenditures at work or study were 7042.5 MET-min/week for women with normal posture, 2947.5 MET-min/week for those with round back, and 2539.5 MET-min/week for women with scoliotic posture. Thus, women with normal posture had the highest energy expenditures, while expenditures in the round-back and scoliotic groups were 58% and 64% lower, respectively. Statistical testing did not reveal significant differences between the three groups (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, analysis of medians and interquartile ranges highlighted clear trends: women with normal posture consistently demonstrated higher PA and energy expenditures. Conversely, postural deviations, such as round back or scoliosis, may limit range of motion, causing faster fatigue and necessitating compensatory efforts.Most participants reported regular motorized transport use approximately 4 days per week, with trips typically lasting around 45 minutes, though some trips were shorter and others lasted several hours. Walking was systematic: the majority of women walked 5–7 days per week for about 45 minutes, forming part of daily routines; for some, walking represented minor movements, while for others, it was a substantial component of total PA. The absence of cycling in the sample simplifies interpretation, as MET contributions for the “Transportation” domain were practically equivalent to walking. Average energy expenditures for walking were 1039.5 MET-min/week, closely matching total expenditures in the transportation domain (1157.7 MET-min/week). Hence, everyday mobility provided adequate energy output.Conclusions. The IPAQ is a valuable and practically indispensable tool for rapid population studies and for detecting trends in PA levels. However, its limitations in validity compared to objective methods necessitate, wherever possible, a combined approach and careful interpretation of results in the context of wartime and socio-economic constraints faced by women in the second period of adulthood in Ukraine.
References
1. Демьохін Д., Асаулюк І. Стан біомеханіки постави та особливості соматометричних показників жінок другого періоду зрілого віку. Спортивний вісник Придніпров’я. 2024. № 1. С. 34–42. https://doi.org/10.32540/2071-1476- 2024-1-034.
2. Кашуба В., Гончарова Н., Носова Н. Біомеханіка просторової організації тіла людини: теоретичні та практичні аспекти Теорія і методика фізичного виховання і спорту. 2020. № 2. С. 67–85.
3. Кашуба В.О., Григус І.М., Руденко Ю.В. Стан просторової організації тіла осіб зрілого віку: виклик сьогодення Influence of physical culture and sports on the formation of an individual healthy lifestyle : Scientific monograph. Riga, Latvia : Baltija Publishing. 2023. P. 56–68. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-280-7-3.
4. Кашуба В.О., Самойлюк О. В., Шевчук О. М., Ярмолинський Л.М., Покропивний О.М. Особливості біогеометричного профілю постави жінок першого періоду зрілого віку. Спортивна медицина, фізична терапія та ерготерапія. 2025. № 1. С. 67–77. https://doi.org/10.32782/spmed.2025.1.10.
5. Arumugam A., Alsaafin N., Shalash R.J., Qadah R.M., Al-Sharman A., Moustafa I.M., Maffulli N. Concurrent validity between self-reported International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form and Fibion accelerometer data among young adults in the UAE. European Journal of Medical Research. 2024. Vol. 29. Article 426. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-01975-5.
6. Bielikova N., Indyka S., Bielikov O. Physical Activity and Quality of Life of Internally Displaced Persons. Physical Education, Sport and Health Culture in Modern Society. 2024. Vol. 4 (68). P. 26–31. https://doi.org/10.29038/2220-7481-2024-04-26-31.
7. Blasco-Peris C., Climent-Paya V., Vetrovsky T., García-Álvarez M.I., Manresa-Rocamora A., Beltrán-Carrillo V.J., Sarabia J.M. International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form and accelerometer-assessed physical activity: concurrent validity using six cut-points in HF patients. ESC Heart Failure. 2023. Vol. 11 (1). P. 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14514.
8. Cunningham D.J., Ohles J.A. Women and physical fitness. In Women’s Health on the Internet. 2023. P. 85–98. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1300/j138v04n02_08.
9. Chen B. Research on the application of marketing strategy of national fitness exercise and dance events in the construction of sports culture based on big data technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. Sciendo, 2024. № 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.1.00077.
10. Harvey R., Peper E., Mason L., Joy M. Effect of posture feedback training on health. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020. Vol. 45(2). P. 59–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-020-09457-0.
11. Hellem T., Dolan H., Parker M., Taylor-Piliae R. The Perspectives and Experiences of Women Who Attend a Mind-Body Dance Fitness Program: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Behavioral Health and Psychology. 2023. Vol. 12 (2). https://doi.org/10.33425/2832-4579/23053.
12. Kashuba V., Tomilina Y., Byshevets N., Khrypko I., Stepanenko O., Grygus I., Smoleńska O., Savliuk S. Impact of Pilates on the Intensity of Pain in the Spine of Women of the First Mature age. Physical Education Theory and Methodology. 2020. Vol. 20 (1). P. 12–17. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.02.
13. Lazko O., Byshevets N., Kashuba V., Lazakovych Yu., Grygus I., Andreieva N., Skalski D. Prerequisites for the Development of Preventive Measures Against Office Syndrome Among Women of Working Age. Physical Education Theory and Methodology. 2021. Vol. 21 (3). P. 227–234. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2021.3.06.
14. Lazko O., Byshevets N., Plyeshakova O., Lazakovych Yu., Kashuba V., Grygus I., Volchinskiy A., Smal J., Yarmolinsky L. Determinants of office syndrome among women of working age. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. Vol. 21 (Suppl. issue 5). P. 2827–2834. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.s5376.
15. Ljubojevic A., Jakovljevic V., Bijelic S., Sarbu I., Tohanean D.I., Albina C., Alexe D.I. The Effects of Zumba Fitness® on Respiratory Function and Body Composition Parameters: An Eight-Week Intervention in Healthy Inactive Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023. Vol. 20 (1). Р. 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010314.
16. Medina C., Monge A., Denova-Gutiérrez E., López-Ridaura R., Barquera, S., Romieu I., & Lajous M. Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) long-form in a subsample of female Mexican teachers. Salud Pública de México. 2022. Vol. 64. P. 57–65. https://doi.org/10.21149/12889.
17. Meh K., Sember V., Sorić M., Vähä-Ypyä H., Rocha P., & Jurak, G. The dilemma of physical activity questionnaires: Fitter people are less prone to over reporting. PLoS One. 2023. Vol. 18 (8), e0285357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285357.
18. Podrihalo O., Podrigalo L., Podavalenko O., Perevoznyk V., Paievskyi V., Sokol K. Use of indices to assess women’s health in wellness fitness. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2024. Vol. 28 (2). P. 132–140. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2024.0207.
19. Reppa C.M., Bogdanis G.C., Stavrou NAM, Psychountaki M. The Effect of Aerobic Fitness on Psychological, Attentional and Physiological Responses during a Tabata High-Intensity Interval Training Session in Healthy Young Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023. Vol. 20 (2), 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021005.
20. Roberts-Lewis S.F., White C.M., Ashworth M., & Rose M.R. The validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) for adults with progressive muscle diseases. Disability and Rehabilitation. Advance online publication. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1983042.
21. Silva M.M., Santos A.M., Arossi G.A. Body posture and the state of mood in women. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2023. Vol. 25, e95862. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2023v25e95862.
22. Tkachova A., Dutchak M., Kashuba V., Goncharova N., Lytvynenko Y., Vako I., Kolos S., Lopatskyi S. Practical implementation of differentiated approach to developing water aerobics classes for early adulthood women with different types of body build. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2020. Vol. 20 (S. 1). P. 456–60. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s1067.


