EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION IN THE “THERAPIST – PATIENT” SYSTEM IN A CLINICAL INSTITUTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2025.19.1.8Keywords:
communication, physical therapist, occupational therapist, patient, clinical setting, communication barriers, effective interactionAbstract
Introduction. Effective communication between a therapist and a patient is a key factor in providing high-quality medical care. It influences the level of patient trust, adherence to treatment, therapy effectiveness, and overall satisfaction with medical services. However, communication barriers often arise in the interaction between a doctor and a patient, which can reduce the quality of treatment. Objective of the study. The aim of this study is to analyze the fundamental principles of effective communication between a therapist and a patient, identify barriers, and develop strategies to overcome them. Materials and methods. The study utilized the following methods: analysis of scientific literature on medical communication; a survey of 150 patients to assess their level of satisfaction with communication with a therapist; a survey of 30 therapists (including 20 physical therapists and 10 occupational therapists) to identify challenges in patient interaction; observation of 10 consultations to evaluate therapists’ verbal and non-verbal communication; and an experimental communication training program for therapists, with subsequent assessment of its impact on the quality of therapist-patient interaction. Results. The study identified four main groups of communication barriers: verbal barriers – the use of complex medical terminology and the lack of verification of patient understanding; non-verbal barriers – insufficient eye contact, closed posture, and a low level of active listening; psychological barriers – patient fear of diagnosis, low level of trust, and emotional burnout of patients due to the ongoing war in the country; organizational barriers – lack of time for consultations, absence of communication training for therapists, and insufficient use of digital technologies in rehabilitation. Conclusions. After conducting a short communication training program, several positive outcomes were achieved: after therapists completed the medical communication training, patient satisfaction with diagnosis explanations increased from 58 to 82%; the use of the «teach-back» technique increased by 30%, improving patient understanding of treatment recommendations; enhanced therapist empathy raised patient satisfaction with therapist interaction from 65 to 89%. The findings confirm the necessity of implementing communication skills training for therapists and other healthcare professionals.
References
1. Абдряхімова Ц., Мухаровська І., Клебан К., Сапон Д., Калачов О. Особливості комунікації у медичному середовищі (методичні рекомендації). PMGP. 2020. № 5 (1). С. 04501212. DOI: 10.26766/pmgp.v5i1.212.
2. Дзяк Л. Комунікативна та конфліктна компетентність лікарів-інтернів за фахом «Нервові хвороби». Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини. 2018. № 2. Вип. 74. С. 44–51. DOI: 10.31718/2077-1096.21.2.182.
3. Кіржа Н. Формування комунікативної компетентності студентів в інформаційно-освітньому середовищі медичного коледжу. Modern approaches to knowledge management development : collective monograph / Ljubljana School of Business. Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2020. С. 368–378.
4. Климович С. Основні правила комунікації в медичній діяльності. Медсестринство. 2022. № 2. С. 14–16. DOI: 10.11603/2411-1597.2022.2.12896.
5. Кушнєрьова А. До проблеми комунікації медичних працівників з пацієнтами: психологічний аспект. Актуальні проблеми психології : збірник наукових праць Інституту психології імені Г.С. Костюка Національної академії педагогічних наук України. 2020. № 4. С. 208–216.
6. Кушнєрьова А. Завдання комунікації в діаді «лікар – пацієнт» кардіологічного профілю. Fundamental and applied researches in practice of leading scientific schools. Hamilton. 2022. № 43 (1). С. 26–30.
7. Сікорська О., Орду К. Комунікативна компетентність як показник професійного іміджу сучасного лікаря. Актуальні питання гуманітарних наук. 2021. № 3. Вип. 43. С. 208–212. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/43-3-34.
8. Abdolrahimi M., Ghiyasvandian S., Zakerimoghadam M., Ebadi A. Iranian nursing student–patient health communication in medical surgical wards. Iran J Nurs midwifery Res. 2018. № 23 (2). Р. 136. DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_9_17.
9. Anthony-Pillai R., Ahluwalia S. Medical professionalism. Clin Integr Care. 2020. № 2. Р. 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcar.2020.100014.
10. Delgado J. Vulnerability as a key concept in relational patient-centered professionalism. Med Health Care Philos. 2021. № 24 (2). Р. 155–172. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-020-09995-8.
11. Naughton C.A. Patient-centered communication. Pharmacy. 2018. № 6 (1). Р. 18. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy6010018.
12. Silverman M.G., Ference B.A., Im K., Wiviott S.D., Giugliano R.P., Grundy S.M. et al. Association between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction among Different Therapeutic Interventions : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA. 2016. № 316. Р. 1289–1297. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.13985.
13. Rider E.A., Keefer C.H. Communication skills competencies: definitions and a teaching toolbox. Medical Education. 2006. № 40. Р. 624–629. DOI: 10.111//y. /365-2929.2006.02500.x.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.